format number properly
This commit is contained in:
parent
1dc9e8227e
commit
d730d1f4a7
15 changed files with 67 additions and 29 deletions
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
#import "@local/template-thesis-matisse:0.0.1": todo, etal, eg
|
||||
#import "../lib.typ": todo, etal, eg
|
||||
#import "X_var.typ": *
|
||||
#import "X_lib.typ": *
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ We manually searched the tool repository when the website mentioned in the paper
|
|||
- the source code of the tool;
|
||||
- the documentation for building and using the tool with a MWE (Minimum Working Example).
|
||||
|
||||
In @tab:rasta-tools we rated the quality of these artifacts with "#ok" when available but may have inconsistencies, a "#bad" when too much inconsistencies (inaccurate remarks about the sources, dead links or missing parts) have been found, a "#ko" when no documentation have been found, and a double "#ok#ok" for the documentation when it covers all our expectations (building process, usage, MWE).
|
||||
In @tab:rasta-tools we rated the quality of these artifacts with "#ok" when available but may have inconsistencies, a "#bad" when too much inconsistencies (inaccurate remarks about the sources, dead links or missing parts) have been found, a "#ko" when no documentation have been found, and a double "#okk" for the documentation when it covers all our expectations (building process, usage, MWE).
|
||||
Results show that documentation is often missing or very poor (#eg Lotrack), which makes the rebuild process very complex and the first analysis of a MWE.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue