more alt text

3_rasta/3_experiments.typ

@@ -253,13 +253,26 @@ We can observe that all Java-based tools have a finishing rate that decreases ov
 50% of non-Java-based tools have the same behaviour.
 ]
 
-#todo[Alt text for fig rasta-decorelation-size]
 #figure(stack(dir: ltr,
   [#figure(
     image(
       "figs/decorelation/finishing-rate-of-java-based-tool-by-discovery-year-of-apks-with-a-bytecode-size-between-4-08-mb-and-5-2-mb.svg", 
       width: 50%,
-      alt: ""
+      alt: (
+        "A graph showing the finishing rate (from 0 to 100) on the y-axe ",
+        "and the year the applications were first seen (from 2013 to ",
+        "2023) on the x-axes. There is a line for each of the following ",
+        "tools: anadroid, blueseal, dialdroid, didfail, droidsafe, ",
+        "flowdroid, gator, ic3, ic3_fork, iccta, perfchecker and saaf. ",
+        "saaf starts at 95% in 2013, ic3 and ic3_fork at 75%, gator at 70%, ",
+        "dialdroid at 45%, flowdroid, the others between 10% and 0%. ",
+        "Gator finishin in 2023 at 90%, ic3 at 70%, flowdroid at 40%, ",
+        "perfchecker at 15%, the rest between 10% and 0%. ",
+        "Except for saaf and ic3_fork which drop between 2014 and 2016 for ",
+        "saaf and starting from 2018 for ic3_fork, the looks stables, with ",
+        "some increasing in between 2013 and 2018 then decreasing back to ",
+        "levels similar to the ones in 2013."
+      ).join()
     ),
     caption: [a) Java-based tools],
     supplement: none,
@@ -269,7 +282,22 @@ We can observe that all Java-based tools have a finishing rate that decreases ov
     image(
       "figs/decorelation/finishing-rate-of-non-java-based-tool-by-discovery-year-of-apks-with-a-bytecode-size-between-4-08-mb-and-5-2-mb.svg",
       width: 50%,
-      alt: "",
+      alt: (
+        "A graph showing the finishing rate (from 0 to 100) on the y-axe ",
+        "and the year the applications were first seen (from 2013 to ",
+        "2023) on the x-axes. There is a line for each of the following ",
+        "tools: adagio, amandroid, androguard, androguard_dad, apparecium, ",
+        "mallodroid, redexer and wognsen_et_al. ",
+        "androguard_dad starts at 50% in 2013, amandroid at 75%, adagio, ",
+        "androguard, apparecium, mallodroid and redexer start between 90% and ",
+        "100%, and wogsen_et_al starts at 3% in 2017. ",
+        "wogsen_et_al finishes at 5% in 2023, androguard_dad at 60%, redexer ",
+        "at 70%, apparecium at 90%, the other between 95% and 100%. ",
+        "androguard_dad drom from 50% in 2013 to 15% in 2015 up to 2017, ",
+        "then start rising to 60% in 2023. amandroid rise from 75% in 2013 to ",
+        "90% in 2015 then stay stable. All the other lines are stable, execpt ",
+        "for redexer that drop just at the end, in 2022-2023.",
+      ).join()
     ),
     caption: [b) Non-Java-based tools],
     supplement: none,
@@ -284,13 +312,20 @@ We selected the sixth decile (between 4.08 and 5.20 MB), which is well represent
 We observe that 9 tools out of 12 have a finishing rate dropping below 20% for Java-based tools, which is not the case for non-Java-based tools.
 ]
 
-#todo[Alt text for fig rasta-decorelation-min-sdk]
 #figure(stack(dir: ltr,
   [#figure(
     image(
       "figs/decorelation/finishing-rate-of-java-based-tool-by-min-sdk-of-apks-with-a-bytecode-size-between-4-08-mb-and-5-2-mb.svg", 
       width: 50%,
-      alt: ""
+      alt: (
+        "A graph showing the finishing rate (from 0 to 100) on the y-axe ",
+        "and the min SDK of the applications (from 0 to 28) on the x-axes. ",
+        "There is a line for each of the following tools: anadroid, blueseal, ",
+        "dialdroid, didfail, droidsafe, flowdroid, gator, ic3, ic3_fork, ",
+        "iccta, perfchecker and saaf. They all start at 100% for SDK 0. After ",
+        "that, the figure become quite unreadable, the lines jump up and down, ",
+        "but it looks like in average the lines go down with min SDK. "
+      ).join()
     ),
     caption: [a) Java-based tools],
     kind: "sub-rasta-decorelation-size-decile-min-sdk",
@@ -300,7 +335,15 @@ We observe that 9 tools out of 12 have a finishing rate dropping below 20% for J
     image(
       "figs/decorelation/finishing-rate-of-non-java-based-tool-by-min-sdk-of-apks-with-a-bytecode-size-between-4-08-mb-and-5-2-mb.svg",
       width: 50%,
-      alt: "",
+      alt: (
+        "A graph showing the finishing rate (from 0 to 100) on the y-axe ",
+        "and the min SDK of the applications (from 0 to 28) on the x-axes. ",
+        "There is a line for each of the following tools: adagio, amandroid, ",
+        "androguard, androguard_dad, apparecium, mallodroid, redexer and wognsen_et_al.",
+        "Appart from androguard_dad that goes down then back up again, they ",
+        "all appear to average arround the same value all along, but with some ",
+        "noise, going up and down from one version to the next."
+      ).join()
     ),
     caption: [b) Non-Java-based tools],
     kind: "sub-rasta-decorelation-size-decile-min-sdk",