erf, not good, but it's something at least
All checks were successful
/ test_checkout (push) Successful in 1m47s
All checks were successful
/ test_checkout (push) Successful in 1m47s
This commit is contained in:
parent
c34eb1b838
commit
fede0bd9b2
5 changed files with 42 additions and 36 deletions
|
@ -32,6 +32,6 @@ As a summary, the contributions of this chapterare the following:
|
|||
The chapter is structured as follows.
|
||||
@sec:rasta-methodology presents the methodology employed to build our evaluation process and @sec:rasta-xp gives the associated experimental results.
|
||||
@sec:rasta-failure-analysis investigates the reasons behind the observed failures of some of the tools.
|
||||
We then compare in @sec:rasta-soa-comp our results with the contributions presented in @sec:bg-eval-tools.
|
||||
We then compare in @sec:rasta-soa-comp our results with the contributions presented in @sec:bg.
|
||||
In @sec:rasta-reco, we give recommendations for tool development we drawn from our experience running our experiment.
|
||||
Finally, @sec:rasta-limit list the limit of our approach, @sec:rasta-futur present further avenues that did not had time to pursue and @sec:rasta-conclusion concludes the chapter.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
== State-of-the-Art Comparison <sec:rasta-soa-comp>
|
||||
|
||||
In this section, we will compare our results with the contributions presented in @sec:bg-eval-tools.
|
||||
In this section, we will compare our results with the contributions presented in @sec:bg.
|
||||
|
||||
Luo #etal released TaintBench~@luoTaintBenchAutomaticRealworld2022 a real-world benchmark and the associated recommendations to build such a benchmark.
|
||||
These benchmarks confirmed that some tools such as Amandroid and Flowdroid are less efficient on real-world applications.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue